
La Charite, William Adolphene Bouguereau.
charity (n.) mid-12c., “benevolence for the poor,” from Old French charité “(Christian) charity, mercy, compassion; alms; charitable foundation” (12c., Old North French carité), from Latin caritatem (nominative caritas) “costliness, esteem, affection” (in Vulgate often used as translation of Greek agape “love” — especially Christian love of fellow man — perhaps to avoid the sexual suggestion of Latin amor), from carus “dear, valued,” from PIE *karo-, from root *ka- “to like, desire” (see whore (n.)).
I fear that modernism has killed our appreciation of many things, including art. This is true of one of my favorite artists. He went unappreciated for decades, even in the 1980’s his pieces could be had for a few thousand dollars, because he held onto the old ways while modern art marched across Western Civilization like the jackboots of the Nazis. The same thing that they did to literature with criticism by experts and deconstruction, they did to art, to the detriment of all. This is one of my favorite paintings by that artist, La Charité by Bouguereau. Each child is a theme, a depiction of one aspect of charity, as exemplified by a mother, the ultimate giver. Attention, sustenance, comfort, shelter, education. And the theme of the vessel of money poured out haphazardly for her children. Women are always a picture, the glory of man. They depict the care of husbands, or fathers. The work of their hands is made manifest in her eyes. Just as the Church on this earth is the glory of Christ, we are his bride. He pulled us from the mud, he took on all our past hurts, all our past abusive relationships and he made us beautiful(Ezekiel 16). We are his image. He always made the women he was amongst more beautiful.

Another fine Bouguereau painting. When a Bob Jonesian legalist, criticized his work for it’s nudity. Bouguereau lamented that they had missed the point. He had thought that he captured the expressions so well. The painting was not about nudity, it was about spring.