So this was concering this nut job Arthur J. Jones, who was running for congress in Illinois’s 3rd District. He became the Republican candidate unopposed, because normal people wouldn’t bother running. It’s a Big City district, in the most corrupt state in the Union, run by Democrats, Republicans don’t stand a chance. Of course he lost getting only 28.8% of the vote. But I think the unclear, muddle of accusations about ‘Nazi’ and ‘Nationalist’ are important points.
It’s so hard to source these things. This seems to be a collaborative effort by at least three people. So we’ll just chalk it up to the internet.
I am wondering how the thinking goes here. Though it is probably impossible to get anyone to think about this, I am going to try. I know it is much easier to just label things you don’t like and run away or attack them. And if you get enough people with minds similarly closed, you can live a quiet, successful life in your bubble. But I’m going for it anyway. If you are already upset, just call me a racist and move on.
First of all, I was unable to find any links to this guy’s website. It seems people would rather characterize, most likely mischaracterize, him than to mock his ideas for what they actually are, insane. He says he’s not a Nazi why call him a Nazi? It obviously sounds bad. I’m not sure why it sounds worse to the average American than ‘Communist’, given that they killed far more innocent people. The Russians killed two times more people and the Chinese three times more people than Hitler. He says he’s not a member of the National Socialist Party. Who even knew that was a thing? On the other hand the Communist party in the US is alive and kicking and it’s not so little sister Socialism is thriving. Socialist Bernie sanders is a hero. Obama had a number of Communist and Communist sympathizers in his administration. So it’s not about deaths resulting from poisonous ideologies. It’s just name calling.
To me the most ridiculous part of what this guy says is his denying the Holocaust. I’m not sure what the point is when he is clearly blaming the Jews for everything, the same ideas that would logically lead to a Holocaust. Is the basis of the Jew’s power today the narrative of the Holocaust? Then why did they enjoy similar power, even in Germany before it? It’s really a dumb idea. But since this is so bad why do the liberals sidle up to Holocaust deniers? Ahmadinejad, a blatant denier, was invited to speak at Columbia University the Liberal Mecca. We pretend he is a legitimate member of the UN and allow him and his holocaust agnostic predecessor Rouhani to ramble on for hours there. Then Obama gives Iran pallets of cash and nuclear weapons.
Ahmadinejad’s position is basically, “there was no holocaust but we want it to happen again”. Can you get more anti-Semitic? And that is basically the position of Islam. It’s fundamentally in the religion laid down by Muhammed. Muslim nations fought side-by-side with the actual Nazis and they do all they can to kill Jews to this day. Their fundamental beef with the United States is our support of Israel. And which political party is it which attacks U.S. support of Israel whenever they can? Which political party has no problem appointing Muslims to political office in the U.S.? They not only don’t complain, they cheer as if the diversity gods have showered blessings upon them. But I do wonder what is there in Islam of any value that is not already in Christianity? There is nothing good, but there is a lot of evil baggage. Why all the fawning over anti-semites? Clearly this is also not the issue with Jones.
So what about white supremacy? I wonder even about the self contradictory nature of this claim. A supremacist seems to be a person who says that people with white skin are better, unless they are a Jew. So we have qualified it to more than being white. And he seems fine with “Black Christian Patriots, Latino Christian Patriots”. So, it’s not really about skin color. Everyone knows that, that is ridiculous. It seems to me that this too is all about name calling. It’s far easier to call someone a white supremacist than a pro Western Civilizationer. This notion of basing any belief on skin color is really hard to prove. As far as I have ever seen, even the craziest supremacist is usually talking about cultural issues and not color. And the whole notion of seeing things in terms of race is very new. The term, ‘racist’ only dates back to 1936. It’s just an ignorant way to make character distinctions. Before that time groups of people were thought of in terms of tongues or tribes or nations. And of course there was always plenty of hate to go around. I suppose it’s not much of a distinction but hating someone because they are a Hatfield or a Capulet makes more sense than hating them because they are black. The one religion to cut across these distinctions was Christianity, in stark contrast again to Muhammed and his tribal supremacy religion. The idea of determining worth based on simple genetic traits comes from Darwin. The same Darwin praised in front of every school child to this day. In fact Darwin denying is about the only thing worse than Holocaust denying to today’s Liberal. And Darwin was what motivated Hitler. If humans just evolved and it was all about survival of the fittest, then that’s the meaning of life, and we should help nature in this selection process. In some sense the Germans are the fittest, their GDP is higher than any other European country. In some sense whites in America are supreme, based on economic or criminal standards. But who cares? This is only a problem for people who think economic worth or statistical metrics are all that matter on this earth, the materialists. Again Christians are the only ones with a different answer, a metaphysical answer. Humans have value because we were created in the image of God. Today Liberal programs like affirmative action and quotas, are clearly racially motivated. Rectifying problems based on skin color is just as wrong as blaming people for skin color. Isn’t subsidizing people because they are black, just another way of saying white people are better? So again, color is not the issue with this guy.
And finally this guy dared to be against Homosexuality. Which is actually about the most common view in all of mankind. Even most of today’s politicians were against it, until a few days ago. I also can’t help but be reminded of Ahmadinejad being questioned about homosexuality at Columbia. He said there were no homosexuals in Iran and then asked a student who brought it up, if they knew of any. Presumably, so he could execute them. Yet somehow, Liberals find Muslims warm and cuddly. The fact that Homosexuality was a fundamental part of the actual Nazi party is generally overlooked. But it’s true. And the fact that homosexuals were sent to death camps doesn’t make me a liar it just means the house of evil is not divided as you might think. Does it make any sense that the Jewish George Soros funds Hammas? Not on the surface but if you look closer, the Hungarian Jew actually participated with the Nazis in confiscation of Jewish property. His concern for nationality is clearly subservient to his concern for money. This guy basically funds the Democrat Party. So it’s no stretch to suggest that homosexuals were rounding up other homosexuals, that type of dominance is exactly what homosexuals do.
So I am wondering what it is that Liberals object to here? Perhaps some combination of traits thy find acceptable in Soros, Obama’s White House, your average Muslim, Russian Communist, Chinese Communists, Cuba, or Darwinian Atheists, become evil when mixed together in a certain ratio? No doubt their real charge against him is that he is not a multiculturalist. Which is really just the pagan anti-Thological response to the Holocaust. A response I find quite lame. They no doubt also object to him being upset at the decline of Christianity and his dislike of the two party system. They also might object to his criticizing politicians for being lying, cheating, war mongers, who are decadent. Things which characterize most Democrats. But I think as always, the line is drawn at Orthodox Christianity. They hate Jesus and anything associated with him.