Having read your front page story pushing for a new city ordinance,  I was appalled. Not necessarily by the subject of the ordinance but by the abuse of the English language. Condensing a broad diverse language into two categories of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ is alarming.  Apparently ‘discrimination’ has been put into the bad category and ‘equality’ into the good.  If every word simply becomes either an insult or a compliment where will we be?  We will have no means of expressing anything.  Discrimination refers to ones ability to determine difference between things. I think this is a handy word to have around.  Supporters of the ordinance think so too.  They discriminate between two groups; traditional morality and a minority of mental genders, type of sin practiced, or type-of-below-the-waist-surgery-had.  Which brings to mind another useful word, ‘hypocrite’. 

Currently, a person is free to protect himself and his children from behaviors that most of humanity does and has considered evil.  They call this the “suffering” of people who have suddenly decided that biology is a choice and who think temptation is an unequivocal call of nature. But, they simply want to switch the group who suffers. Since these new groups are a clear minority, this would only result in more suffering. You don’t change laws that make it difficult for the sexually perverse, into laws that make it difficult for traditional families and call it “good for family.”  Laws discriminate.   Apparently these words now have complex definitions dependent on who uses them. Their man-made ‘equality’ is better than God’s. This requires as much verbal surgery as the two women pretending to be parents or the man who thinks god gave him the wrong sex toys. 

These hypocrites should move back to where their new language is spoken or learn our language.